<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smith &amp; Wesson M&amp;P 40 Compact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texascustomholsters.com/2008/12/22/smith-wesson-mp-40-compact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texascustomholsters.com/2008/12/22/smith-wesson-mp-40-compact/</link>
	<description>Made in the USA Custom Car Mountable Holsters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.texascustomholsters.com/2008/12/22/smith-wesson-mp-40-compact/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecarry.com/?p=185#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I just purchased my 40c and have been very happy with it so far, good weight, great caliber and I like the improvements they made on Glocks design. Very impressed

(ps. The picture above is of a 9c not a 40)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased my 40c and have been very happy with it so far, good weight, great caliber and I like the improvements they made on Glocks design. Very impressed</p>
<p>(ps. The picture above is of a 9c not a 40)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.texascustomholsters.com/2008/12/22/smith-wesson-mp-40-compact/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecarry.com/?p=185#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I feel the 40c Smith &amp; Wesson is an excellent handgun.  I purchased mine used with only about 200 rounds through it.  Very accurate and comfortable.  Would definitely buy another Smith&amp;Wesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the 40c Smith &amp; Wesson is an excellent handgun.  I purchased mine used with only about 200 rounds through it.  Very accurate and comfortable.  Would definitely buy another Smith&amp;Wesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r.j.friske</title>
		<link>http://www.texascustomholsters.com/2008/12/22/smith-wesson-mp-40-compact/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>r.j.friske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://safecarry.com/?p=185#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I presently own a 2009 version of the 40c and it’s a great handgun. I like the steel mags, I like the steel Novak sights, I like the way it disassembles (safe), I like the mix of hardened stainless steel parts mixed with high tech polymer (the polymer is stiffer than Glock--more like HK). The 40c is not as compact or a light as the Glock 27. The 40c weighs 1.9ozs more and is 1/4” longer in the barrel and in the grip area--but the 40c handles recoil much better, and seems more accurate in my hands, which could make a real difference in a tactical situation. The 40c is a good compromise between the Glock 23 &amp; 27, the 40c holds 11 and the 27 holds 10. The two styles of mags, 3 interchangeable grip styles, and the interchangeable mag release are a huge advantage (the 40c fits my hand like nothing else, the mag release will make lefties very happy)--and its made in the USA (which is why I gave the 40c another turn). Smith &amp; Wesson has taken the &quot;Glock&quot; to the next logical step--if you are looking to replace a duty of off-duty weapon consider the 40c. By the way a 50,000 round torture test was just accomplished (4/2009)—so it’s tough too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I presently own a 2009 version of the 40c and it’s a great handgun. I like the steel mags, I like the steel Novak sights, I like the way it disassembles (safe), I like the mix of hardened stainless steel parts mixed with high tech polymer (the polymer is stiffer than Glock&#8211;more like HK). The 40c is not as compact or a light as the Glock 27. The 40c weighs 1.9ozs more and is 1/4” longer in the barrel and in the grip area&#8211;but the 40c handles recoil much better, and seems more accurate in my hands, which could make a real difference in a tactical situation. The 40c is a good compromise between the Glock 23 &amp; 27, the 40c holds 11 and the 27 holds 10. The two styles of mags, 3 interchangeable grip styles, and the interchangeable mag release are a huge advantage (the 40c fits my hand like nothing else, the mag release will make lefties very happy)&#8211;and its made in the USA (which is why I gave the 40c another turn). Smith &amp; Wesson has taken the &#8220;Glock&#8221; to the next logical step&#8211;if you are looking to replace a duty of off-duty weapon consider the 40c. By the way a 50,000 round torture test was just accomplished (4/2009)—so it’s tough too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
